Note: This is an archived version of The Thursday Briefing.
The current blog is at http://thursdaybriefing.eu.

A Dose Of New Labour For Europe

I’m not looking to discuss any aspect of the foreign policy issues tonight. Tonight is about me having got this job and I now need to sit down with colleagues and work through a whole range of issues…

More on our new glorious leaders, as Baroness Ashton has, in the video above, spoken to the press. It’s nice to see the great political vision of someone who wants to settle in and hold things steady. I suppose there is some virtue in very carefully getting everything started, but I still want there to be some vision at the top. Maybe the next president and foreign minister will be more inspiring; we can only hope.

Video from EUX.TV.

Tags: , , ,

What Harm Can One Footnote Inflict?

2514086660_38cb354625

Klaus cannot be serious! After the struggle to get every member state to ratify Lisbon, with just Poland (though it seems like it is soon to ratify) and the Czech Republic still to do so, and with his own Parliament supporting ratification, he has the gall to suggest an amendment that might require another ratification round!

This can be nothing but obstruction for obstruction’s sake; even if there was some substance to his request for a footnote, it’s unlikely to be compatible with the spirit of the Treaty. All I can see from the European Voice and BBC articles on this is that Klaus wants something vague on the Charter of Fundamental Rights, which in his political context likely means a weakening of it—and yes, I know the UK has an opt-out on the Charter, which I disagree with, but at least we negotiated it at the right time, and in the right way.

So, what are the chances of full ratification before the Tories figure out a way to withdraw the British ratification?

Image by Bertelsmann Stiftung on Flickr, used under a Creative Commons licence.

Tags: , , , , , ,

Lisbon? No, Blair

You’d think I’d be writing something on the Irish ‘yes’ to Lisbon, what with this being a European politics blog after all, but I’m afraid you’ll have to wait until Wednesday evening, by which point I will have been enlightened by a panel discussion on the outcome of the referendum with an Irish barrister, and some professors from the Law Department of my university. It’ll also be interesting to see what is being said in the European Parliament on the matter.

Anyway, what I did want to briefly post about tonight is related to Lisbon: specifically, the presidency of the EU. I keep hearing a lot about how ratification of Lisbon will open the door for Tony Blair to become the first new-style President. Now I can’t imagine he’d turn down the job, but the feeling I’m getting from people I’ve talked to about this, and media I’ve read about it, suggests that he’s not really the shoe-in that the British press claim. Anyone have any ideas?

Tags: , , , ,

A Schizophrenic Union

Swedish EU Presidency Logo

Ok, it’s time that I posted something. My extended absence from posting here can be explained by my recently moving house, but it isn’t a good excuse any more. Anyway, reading EurActiv over breakfast this morning, I had a look at their LinksDossier on the Swedish presidency of the EU. After the joke that was the Czech presidency (sorry to any Czechs reading this, it isn’t personal), it was refreshing to see the programme that Sweden has lined up for their six months at the helm. While an “effective, open and results-oriented presidency” sounds a bit too much like management speak to me, it’ still something worth pursuing, while the commitment to ratifying the Lisbon Treaty and the ambition to push Europe forward on actions against climate change are both things which I’d tentatively support (tentatively, as I haven’t had time to look through anything in much more detail than the LinksDossier).

Even if they can’t succeed with all of their programme, as the Centre for European Reform mentions, “Internal political stability and a skilled diplomatic corps should help.”, so I doubt another Czech-style presidency will be seen just yet (again, sorry to any Czech readers).

But it is the risk that the presidency could go wrong again so easily, and the inherent instability that comes from a six-month rotating presidency that just makes such a good argument for a static president with a political mandate. All eyes should be on Ireland to see whether that can happen.

Tags: , , , , ,